Archive > 2018 > March 2018 > A New Standardizable Calculation Method to Predict the Efficiency of Worm Gear Drives

# A New Standardizable Calculation Method to Predict the Efficiency of Worm Gear Drives

Manuel Oehler, Balázs Magyar and Bernd Sauer

## Introduction

Within the scope of the research project FVA 729 I “Worm Gear Efficiency,” a physically based simulation method for the efficiency of worm gear drives was developed. This method is validated by experiments with different gear sizes and ratios. An extensive parameter study with the use of this simulation program was carried out to specify the magnitude of various influencing variables on the efficiency. The large parameter field for this study was created with design of experiments (DoE) to take into account a wide range of different parameter combinations. Based on the principle of similarity, the method of dimensional analysis was applied to derive an approximation equation for the efficiency in order to make the developed method accessible to broad practice. The derivation of this new, physically based formula using dimensionless influencing parameters is the object of this paper. The resulting tool allows calculation engineers to compare different drivetrain concepts with regard to efficiency. These easy-to-handle formulas can be incorporated into the standard DIN 3996.

Worm gearboxes are characterized by the large gear ratios
that can be realized in a single stage, as well as by low-vibration- and
low-noise-running behavior, compared to other gear transmissions. These
positive properties, however, are associated with a lower efficiency compared
to helical gearboxes, due to the high sliding velocities in the tooth
engagement resulting from the intersecting axes. In order to be able to design
efficient drive solutions, various transmission types and design variants must
be comparable with each other in terms of the expected operating efficiency
during the design phase. The approximation equations described in the German
standard DIN 3996 (Ref. 1)
are based on quasi-stationary measurements of gearboxes with a gear ratio of *i** *= 20.5 and with a
center distance of *a** *= 100 mm. The
transferability of the existing and partly standardized empirical formulas to
other sizes and gear ratios is only possible to a limited extent. For this
reason there is a need on the part of industry to expand the field of use of
the calculation method in a broad range of sizes and gear ratios. The aim of
this work is the development of a physically based simulation method which is
verified by experimental results in order to reliably determine the efficiency
of worm gear drives. Included in the investigations are various sizes, gear
ratios and oil types, as well as stationary and transient operating conditions.
The efficiency calculation of worm drives is based on theoretical principles,
taking into account the different interactions of the influencing variables.
This theoretical work is supplemented by random running trials and tribological investigations that provide input data for the
calculations. This results in a physically based simulation model with which worm
gearing can be investigated in a variety of ways. The target variables are,
among other things, the local and the mean tooth friction coefficients, as well
as the gearing and overall efficiency of the gearbox under test. The average
gear friction coefficient can also be used to check the transmission for
possible self-locking or self-braking.

## Tribological Simulation

Magyar studied *ZK*-type cylindrical worm
gears as part of his dissertation at the Institute of Machine Elements, Gears
and Transmissions (MEGT) with regard to the tribological
and dynamic behavior, both experimentally and simultatively
(Ref. 2). In
his work a calculation model was developed based on the work of Bouché (Ref. 3).
Thus, the local tooth friction coefficients and the overall efficiency of worm
drives operating in the mixed friction area can be determined by means of the
TEHD theory in quasi-stationary operating conditions. The simulation model was
verified with own test results. This calculation approach is the starting point
of this work.

To calculate the locally variable tooth friction coefficients of worm gears, the theoretical contact lines are determined first (Fig. 1, left). The calculation of the radius of curvature at the points of contact and the discretization of the contacting tooth flanks by rotating rollers follows (Fig. 1, middle). In order to be able to model the kinematic conditions of the worm and worm wheel, the points in the contact zone are modelled with the aid of rotating rollers. Considering the kinematic behavior of the gears, the sliding and sum velocities in every point of the contact lines are calculated. The lubricating gap height is determined under the assumption of a Hertzian pressure distribution (Fig. 1, right).

Knowing the film thickness of the lubricant and using
pre-calculated division curves for the load-carrying contact ratio derived from
a self-developed software, the rate of boundary
lubrication can be calculated for each rotating pair of rollers. The heat conditions
in the contact zone are determined in an iterative manner by simultaneously
solving the differential equation for Fourier’s law of heat conduction and the
simplified energy equation of the lubricant. With a known lubricant
temperature, the viscosity and the fluid friction force dependent on this
viscosity can be calculated for all pairs of rollers. Subsequently, the
calculation of the coefficient of mixed friction follows, which corresponds to
the local friction coefficient between the gears. A more precise description of
the procedure of this method can be found (Ref. 2).
According to the knowledge of the local tooth friction coefficients, these can
be averaged and thus the total efficiency of the gears *η _{z}
*and the gear power loss

*P*can be calculated.

_{VZ,P}Here, *T*_{2} is the output torque on the
worm wheel shaft; *ω*_{1} is the angular velocity of the drive shaft; *u *is
the tooth ratio; *γ _{m}* is the lead angle of the
worm,

*α*

_{0}is the pressure angle, and

*μ*is the average coefficient of friction. In addition to the tooth friction losses, there are still further sources of loss in the worm gear (Ref. 4).

_{Z}For the calculation of the additional losses, existing
methods, which are state-of-the-art, are used: The calculation of the bearing
losses *P _{VL}* is carried out according to the methods of the
bearing manufacturers, the friction in the dynamic seals

*P*

_{VD}_{ }is carried out according to Engelke’s model (Ref. 5) and the churning losses of the gears

*P*

_{VZ}_{,0}according to (Ref. 6).

## Validation by Experimental Results

For the validation of the tribological
simulation software extensive experimental investigations are carried out with
worm gear drives of different sizes and gear ratios. In the tests, *ZK*-type
worm gears with two different center distances (*a** *= 40 and *a** *= 125 mm) and two gear
ratios (*i** *= 10 and *i** *= 60) are analyzed.
In addition, all tests are carried out with two different types of lubricants.
While the smaller worm gearboxes are from serial production, a new drive with *a** *= 125 mm is designed
especially for research purposes. For all experiments the same kind of
materials (worm: 16MnCr5, worm wheel: CuSn12Ni) is used. The worm wheels of the
smaller gearboxes are made of CuSn12Ni-GC (continuous casting) and the worm
gears of the gearboxes with *a** *= 125mm are made of
CuSn12Ni-GZ (centrifugal casting). The tests are carried out on the modular
MEGT electrical wiring test bench. The basis of this test bench is two
asynchronous machines with a maximum power of *P _{max}* = 30 kW.

The test bench for examining the worm gearboxes with a
center distance of *a** *= 125 mm is designed as
shown in Figure 2. Here, the component’s drive motor (Eq. 3), output motor
(Eq. 13) and
test gearbox (Eq. 7)
can be seen. In addition to the torques and rotational speeds at the input and
output shaft (Eqs. 4, 9), the temperatures are recorded on several non-moving
components. Additionally, the temperature of the rotating worm wheel is
transmitted by telemetry via a Bluetooth transmitter (Eq. 8) and receiver. In
order to reduce the torque at the output motor (Eq. 13), a planetary gearbox (Eq. 12) is built in the
power flow between the latter and the test gearbox (Eq. 7). The test bench for testing the
transmissions with a center distance of *a** *= 40 mm corresponds
largely to the structure described above. Figure 3 shows an example of the
validation results for the gearbox with center distance *a** *= 125 mm and gear ratio *i** *= 10 for lubrication
with polyglycol-based oil (PG) of viscosity class ISO
VG 460. The comparison between the tribological
simulation and the experiments shows very good agreement for both of the
examined sizes. The German standard DIN3996 overestimates the efficiency by up
to 4%, at an input shaft speed of 1,400 min^{–1}.

## Approximation Equations

To apply the results of the described work in
practice, approximation equations for the determination of the gearing
efficiency by simple means are derived. In order to be able to find a suitable
calculation rule, a detailed parametric study with the validated simulation
program is carried out, thus creating a meaningful data basis. Based on this,
the interactions between the different input variables and the efficiency of
gearing are examined in order to be able to quantitatively describe them. The approximation
equations for the determination of the efficiency of worm gear drives are
devised under the guideline of finding a standardized — but
at the same time physically justified — approach that can
be adopted in (Ref. 1).
For this reason many calculation bases and characteristic values (mean pressure
between the tooth flanks *σ _{Hm}*,
mean sliding speed

*v*, mean film thickness

_{gm}*h*, and average sliding distance

_{min.m}*s*) are taken from the existing standard (Ref. 1). Since in practice worm gears operate in the mixed friction area, an approach is used for the approximation equations described below, which considers both boundary and fluid friction in order to reproduce the physical circumstances in the mixed friction area.

_{gm}The average friction coefficient in the worm gear unit *μ _{Z}*
is thus composed of a proportion determined by boundary friction (boundary
friction coefficient

*μ*) and a proportion determined by the fluid friction (fluid friction coefficient

_{Gr}*μ*). The division factor between the friction mechanisms is the load-carrying contact ratio

_{Fl}*ψ*. While local tribological quantities are calculated with the tribological simulation from (Refs. 2, 7) in order to be able to determine the coefficient of friction in the mixed friction area, a global approach with average characteristics is selected for the approximation equations. The transfer from local to global values is outlined in Figure 4. Influence variables such as the coefficient of boundary friction

*μ*, the velocities of the tooth flanks

_{Gr}*v*

_{1}and

*v*

_{2}, the lubricating gap height

*h*and the viscosity of the lubricant

_{min,m}*η*are now no longer calculated for single discretization points, but are incorporated as global variables into the tribological consideration of the tooth contact.

_{m }The load-carrying contact ratio *ψ** *is
calculated using the dimensionless film thickness *λ*. In order to calculate the dimensionless
lubricating gap height *λ*,
the average gap height *h _{min,m}*
is divided by the combined root-mean-squared roughness

*S*

_{q}_{ }of both friction partners (worm

*S*

_{q}_{,1 }and worm gear

*S*

_{q}_{,2}).

In addition to the dimensionless film thickness *λ*, the
deformation behavior of the two friction partners is decisive for the proportion
of boundary friction. With a detailed contact simulation of real-measured
surfaces, a relationship between the approximation of the solids and the
proportion of the surfaces that are in contact with each other can be
calculated. It is found that, in the case of contact calculation with different
worn tooth flank surfaces that have been processed by the same manufacturing method, a similar profile exists of the curve describing the
load-carrying contact ratio results independently of the root-mean-squared
roughness *S _{q}*

*(Fig. 5). This relation can be described according to (Ref. 2) with an equation of the following form:*

The coefficients *a *and *b
*are determined by means of a curve-fitting method from division curves
generated with different surfaces. Figure 5 shows the results of the contact
calculation in the form of the division curves for the load-carrying contact
ratio and a compensation curve.

The coefficient of boundary friction *μ _{Gr}*

_{ }is determined as an integral parameter from friction coefficient measurements at a twin-disc test rig. These measurements are carried out using a combination of materials (steel 16MnCr5 and bronze CuSn12Ni) that are typical for power transmitting worm gear drives and representative surface structures. The additives and the temperature of the lubricant, the pressure between the friction partners, the slide-to-roll ratio (SRR)

*and the direction of rotation of the disks relative to each other (constant or counter-flow), are decisive influencing variables on the boundary friction coefficient, which is determined at very low hydrodynamic velocities. For the approximate calculation of the coefficient of friction between the gears, an average coefficient of boundary friction is required. The parameters of a simplified equation for the estimation of this mean boundary friction coefficient as a function of the mean pressure*

*σ*must be determined separately for each selected lubricant:

_{Hm}The fluid friction coefficient *μ _{Fl}*

_{ }is determined from the shear stress of the fluid in the lubricating gap. This characteristic is calculated by the shear stress

*τ*relative to the mean pressure of the tooth flanks

_{FL}*σ*.

_{Hm}The shear stress *τ _{Fl}*

_{ }is calculated according to the fluid model of Bair and Winer, taking into account a limiting shear stress of the fluid

*τ*(Eq. 9).

_{lim}In addition to the limiting shear stress of the fluid *τ*_{lim}, the mean
sliding velocity *v _{gm}*

*and the mean lubricating film thickness*

*h*, which can be calculated according to (Ref. 1), are also required to calculate the shear stress in the lubrication film. Furthermore, knowledge of the mean dynamic viscosity

_{min,m}*η*

_{m}_{ }of the lubricant in the gap is necessary. The viscosity of the fluid depends essentially on pressure and temperature. The mean pressure between the tooth flanks

*σ*will be used as the pressure in the lubricating gap; the temperature in the gap must be calculated from the temperature in the oil sump

_{Hm}*ϑ*and the flash temperature

_{S}*ϑ*

_{flash}_{ }due to the heat input caused by the friction in the contact zone. The flash temperature depends on the area-related frictional power and the mean sliding distance

*s*, for which the following empirical relationship is used:

_{gm}The thermal constant *C _{th}*

_{ }was obtained using regression methods from the data base generated by the parameter study and is mainly dependent on the materials of the gears and the type of lubricant. The method for determining the lubricant temperature in the lubricating gap requires an average coefficient of friction, which is simultaneously the target value of the calculations, as an input variable. For this reason an iterative approach is required. This means that a starting value for the average coefficient of friction must be estimated and afterwards iterated until the deviation between the result and the incoming coefficient of friction comes down to a limit value. This approach is outlined in Figure 6 and explained in more detail in (Ref. 7). The presented method for the approximate determination of the average coefficient of friction shows very good overall agreement with the detailed tribological simulation method (Fig. 7).

Here, the coefficient of
friction determined by means of the described approximation equations is plotted
over the coefficient of friction determined with the tribological
simulation. In the range of *μ*_{Z} > 0.04, the deviations between the two calculation
methods are, for the most part, *Δ _{μ}*

_{Z}< 0.005. The deviations — particularly with very small coefficients of friction (

*μ*

_{Z}< 0.03) — can be attributed, for example, to the uncertainties in the calculation of the fluid film thickness according to (Ref. 1).

## Conclusion

In this work a physically based method for the tribological investigation of worm gears is presented. In
order to derive a standardized calculation approach, average values instead of
local parameters are used for the tribological
considerations — thus greatly
reducing the computational effort. A comparison of the tooth friction
coefficients calculated using this easy-to-handle method with the more complex,
local simulation shows good agreement.

*Acknowledgments.***
**This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Economics and
Energy (IGF18275 N) within the framework of the cooperative industrial research
and the Forschungsvereinigung Antriebstechnik
(FVA project 729 I) (Ref. 7).

## References

- DIN 3996. Tragfähigkeitsberechnung von Zylinderschnecken-getrieben mit sich Rechtwinklig Kreuzenden Achsen. Berlin: Beuth Verlag 2012.
- Magyar, B. “Tribo-dynamische Untersuchungen von Schneckengetrieben,” Dissertation, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern 2012.
- Bouché, B. “Reibungszahlen von Schneckengetrieben im Mischreibungsgebiet,” Dissertation, Ruhr-Universität Bochum 1991.
- ISO/TR 14179-2. Gears — Thermal Capacity, Part 2: Thermal Load- Carrying Capacity, 2001.
- Engelke, T. “Einfluss der Elastomer-Schmierstoff-Kombination auf das Betriebsverhalten von Radialwellendichtringen,” Dissertation, Universität Hannover 2011.
- Changenet, C. and M. Pasquier. “Power Losses and Heat Exchange in Reduction Gears: Numerical and Experimental Results,” 2nd International Conference on Gears. (VDI Berichte 1665), pp. 603–613. Düsseldorf, VDI-Verlag GmbH 2002.
- Oehler, M., B. Magyar and B. Sauer. Schneckengetriebewirkungsgrade, Abschlussbericht FVA-Vorhaben Nr. 729 I: Frankfurt/Main, Forschungsvereinigung Antriebstechnik 2017.

**Dipl.-Ing. Manuel Oehler**studied mechanical engineering at the University of Kaiserslautern, Institute of Machine Elements, Gears and Transmissions (MEGT), graduating in 2014 as a Graduate Engineer.

**Jun. Prof. Dr. –Ing. Balázs Magyar**received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering in 2012 at the University of Kaiserslautern, and then joined the University the following year as a junior professor of tribology. His current research interests include the tribology of worm gear drives, bearings and shaft seals. Magyar is now teaching machine elements and engineering tribology.

**Prof. Dr.-Ing. Bernd Sauer**holds a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Technische Universität Berlin. From 1987–1998, he has as chief engineer for various companies headed up their development departments in the high-speed rail industry. Since 1998, he has served as full professor and head of the Institute of Machine Elements, Gears, and Transmissions at the University of Kaiserslautern. His current research interests include the dynamics and tribology of bearings, seals and chain drives. Sauer since 2015 has led the Society of Product and Process Design at the Association of German Engineers (VDI).

The article "A New Standardizable Calculation Method to Predict the Efficiency of Worm Gear Drives" appeared in the March 2018 issue of Power Transmission Engineering.

**Keywords**

worm gears, worm drives, lubrication, efficiency